Your name is NOT ACTUALLY ANDY MCMANN, and you are 18 YEARS OLD. You have a VARIETY OF INTERESTS which include MY LITTLE PONY, HOMESTUCK, WRITING, THE ANIMES, and as previously mentioned, THE MUSICS. ALL OF THEM.
Your Chumhandle is almostIndefinitely, your Skype is Andyman_117 and when you are excited YOU TYPE IN ALL CAPS but you occASIONally mix it up A LITTLE.
even with those four numbers there are countless possible combinations good luck with figuring out which one is the right one you punk
It’s pretty likely that it’s a four digit number, and as there are four digits chosen there, that means that there cannot be any repetition. This mean that there are:
n!/(n-4)! possible orders. As ‘n’ is 4 (number of digits available). 4!/0! which becomes 4x3x2x1/1 which simplifies to 24. That means that there are 24 possible combinations of codes. This would take you about two or three minutes to input all possible codes.
Unless an alarm goes off if you don’t get it right in 3 tries
*straightens calculator again*
Kick the fucking door in
well ‘technically’ the code is most likley 1970. statistically, a majority of people, when told to choose a 4 digit code will choose their birth year. and this key pad is obviously a few years old to put it nicely, thats most likley it.
some sherlock holmes shit just went down over here
No, no, no. Don’t base your deductions of psychology. Let’s talk chemistry. When you first press a button, there’s more of the natural oils on your skin, and therefore it wears down the numbers on the keys faster. Obviously 0 is the first one, then. Try 0791 first.
it got better
and this is why the sherlock fandom could either rule the world or end it….
Close, but not quite, I think. People will almost always choose a number they can remember. What’s memorable about 0791? Try 0719 - a birthday, 19th of July. That is more likely.
Those deductions are great and all, but unnecessary.
This is what pisses me off about Tumblr. You all say you’re so accepting and you don’t want to offend anyone, but then thousands of people reblog something like this because Christians aren’t the minority. You wouldn’t want to offend a Muslim, and if this were offensive to them or another minority, there’d be so many comments about it. But everyone is completely fine with offending a non minority. “You’re not oppressed, you can’t talk!” You know what? I’m a Christian and this offends me and my faith, but nobody’s going to care about that because I’m not oppressed. Tumblr is hypocritical and that needs to stop.
Amen to the comment
Oh my precious lambs:
Examine why you are being offended. Because this is literally how a sunset works. There is not room for debate on this question. There is less room for debate on this than there is on just about any other thing. We are not reblogging because Christians aren’t the minority, dear ones. We are reblogging because after the debate a few days ago, creationists were given the opportunity to pose a question for non-creationists. One of these questions was:
"How can you explain a sunset if their is no god?" (sp.)
Questions, we assume, are posed so that someone might answer them. And yes, there is an answer of how exactly one can explain a sunset given the absence of a divine force. Now, you can certainly posit that God is the creator of all things and so all things came from him including the sun and light refraction and anthrax and kittens and famine and all that jazz.
But you don’t get to deny that THIS IS HOW A SUNSET WORKS, and of the necessary elements of this equation (Sun + Atmosphere + Angle = Sunset), God is not one of them. That’s because everything else is an observable phenomenon, and God is not. You can explain a sunset without God. You can go ahead and believe that God’s part of it all. That’s cool. Lots of people believe stuff like that, and I encourage you to delve into the ways that people make science and their faith jive. But if you are offended by being shown the basic scientific principals behind a sunset, you must be offended by damn near everything. And that seems exhausting.
People getting butthurt over science, fucking love it.
… with different degrees of struggles that we’re implemented by the pale skin via conquests using weapons such as warfare, religion indoctrination, and oppression. And then after pale skin set systems like this into our society, they go around and say things like “We are all human” and confuse “racism” with “prejudice” so that they can keep the system the same way for many years to come.
More like you morons completely forget your ancestors did the same damn shit and then try to change the definition of words to exempt yourself from criticism.
Yes because PoC have set up a system where People of Color have ~poc privilege~, don’t confuse “racism” and “prejudice”.
Don’t forget that other countries besides America exist, and damn sure don’t change the definition of fucking words, you dumb cunt.
Well look at that.
The weirdest thing about all of this stuff is they seem to think prejudice is fine. Diet racism. Racism lite. Skim racism.
This is how racist Tumblr is.
Not only do they have such an Americanized view of history and the world but they apply it to everything, where the world thing ever in the world was the white people claiming First Nation’s land and enslaving Africans (and yes, those are awful things, but other nations have done similar).
Not only that, they act like if you aren’t white, you were fucking helpless little lambs for all of history, incapable of evil, brutality or violence. They’re treating entire ethnic groups like children, free of responsibility because of their skin color. Only white people are apparently ‘worthy’ enough respect to be judged by their actions.
Today I leaned “PoC” don’t even have “privilege” or whatever you want to call it in nations they founded themselves where they are the overwhelming majority.
White privilege applies in Japan? Try leaving the house once in a while you uneducated shit-for-brains shut-ins.
Once again, there is no reason to think of racism or sexism as “power + prejudice.” That usage is unique to the field of sociology, in which the “power plus prejudice” crap is a technical term. It’s not a common definition, and moreover it’s not a technical term in all academic disciplines. Psychology is perfectly at home equating racism and sexism with pure prejudice. Also, sociology is among the most intellectually dishonest fields in contemporary academia (see: here & here).
There is, simply put, no good reason for anyone to use “racism” to mean a system, rather than using the adjectival form of “racism” to apply to the system, as in “racist system.” If sociologists find it convenient to use “racism” to describe a system, that is because sociology - apart from being the softest of the soft sciences - deals in behavior of large groups, which means the “discrimination” part of the definition of racism is what matters to them. Consequently, they emphasize the behavioral manifestations rather than the more subjective or cognitive or individual facets.
But unless you’re prepared to argue some kind of radical behaviorist or utilitarian or otherwise anti-mentalist philosophy, there is no reason to adapt the technical term for common use. The only reason strong enough to make a movement attempt to do that would be if it were congenial to their purposes. That is, if redefining the word served their ends. And, of course, it does. You don’t have to be a cynic to see how defining racism so that, no matter what, non-white people cannot be in any way responsible for it serves the end of this particular special interest. Serves them, I might add, at the expense of nuance or correspondence to reality.
In sum, people who want to tell you that “racism = power + prejudice” are really just trying to frame the terms of the debate, move the goalposts a little, and specially plead for their control of the discourse.